<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pact &amp; Health LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com</link>
	<description>Inspire and Ignite Innovations for Cure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Systemic antitumor immune response of doped yttria nanoscintillators under low-dose x-ray irradiation</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/systemic-antitumor-immune-response-of-doped-yttria-nanoscintillators-under-low-dose-x-ray-irradiation/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/systemic-antitumor-immune-response-of-doped-yttria-nanoscintillators-under-low-dose-x-ray-irradiation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Abstract Inadequate light penetration in tissues restricts photodynamic therapy to treating only superficial tumors. To enable x-ray–excited photodynamic therapy (XPDT) that targets deep-seated tumors, we synthesized a nanoscintillator-photosensitizer complex containing 5% Eu-doped Y2O3 fluorescing at 611 nanometers and decorated with SiO2 containing the scintillation-coupled photosensitizer methylene blue and a polyethylene glycol coating [PEGylated Y2O3:Eu@SiO2-methylene blue (pYSM)]. When &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/systemic-antitumor-immune-response-of-doped-yttria-nanoscintillators-under-low-dose-x-ray-irradiation/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Systemic antitumor immune response of doped yttria nanoscintillators under low-dose x-ray irradiation</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Abstract</h3>
<div role="paragraph">Inadequate light penetration in tissues restricts photodynamic therapy to treating only superficial tumors. To enable x-ray–excited photodynamic therapy (XPDT) that targets deep-seated tumors, we synthesized a nanoscintillator-photosensitizer complex containing 5% Eu-doped Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> fluorescing at 611 nanometers and decorated with SiO<sub>2</sub> containing the scintillation-coupled photosensitizer methylene blue and a polyethylene glycol coating [PEGylated Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Eu@SiO<sub>2</sub>-methylene blue (pYSM)]. When irradiated, pYSMs generate singlet oxygen species in vitro, causing cytotoxicity with hallmarks of immunogenic cell death (calreticulin translocation to the cell membrane). Intravenously administered pYSMs home passively to pancreatic tumor xenografts and, upon 10 gray irradiation, cause significant tumor regression (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). On combining XPDT with anti-PD1 immunotherapy, a distant nonirradiated tumor also regresses via an increase in intratumoral activated CD8<sup>+</sup> cytotoxic T cells. Collectively, we advance a systemically delivered XPDT strategy that mediates an antitumor effect in both irradiated and nonirradiated (abscopal) tumors when coupled with immunotherapy, converting an immunologically “cold” tumor to an immunologically “hot” tumor.</div>
<div role="paragraph"><span style="font-size: 1.5em; font-weight: bold;">INTRODUCTION</span></div>
<div role="paragraph">
<div role="paragraph">Photoacoustic imaging (<a id="body-ref-R1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R1" data-xml-rid="R1" aria-label="Reference 1"><i>1</i></a>), photothermal therapy (<a id="body-ref-R2" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R2" data-xml-rid="R2" aria-label="Reference 2"><i>2</i></a>, <a id="body-ref-R3" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R3" data-xml-rid="R3" aria-label="Reference 3"><i>3</i></a>), and photodynamic therapy (<a id="body-ref-R4" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R4" data-xml-rid="R4" aria-label="Reference 4"><i>4</i></a>) are increasingly deployed for the diagnosis and treatment of superficial or endoscopically accessible tissues (<a id="body-ref-R5" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R5" data-xml-rid="R5" aria-label="Reference 5"><i>5</i></a>). However, the inability of light to traverse beyond 1 cm of tissue thickness remains a major challenge for the clinical deployment of these modalities in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors in deep-seated tissues (<a id="body-ref-R6" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R6" data-xml-rid="R6" aria-label="Reference 6"><i>6</i></a>). X-ray–excited photodynamic therapy (XPDT) is a recently proposed modality for treating deep tissue tumors (<a id="body-ref-R7" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R7" data-xml-rid="R7" aria-label="Reference 7"><i>7</i></a>). In XPDT, a scintillating nanoparticle is conjugated to a photosensitizing compound, and under x-ray excitation, the nanoscintillator emits light, which is then absorbed by the photosensitizer to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) (<a id="body-ref-R8" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R8" data-xml-rid="R8" aria-label="Reference 8"><i>8</i></a>). These ROS can then induce cell death via oxidative stress through DNA or lipid membrane damage (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F1">Fig. 1<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Because of the penetration depth and spatial localization of ionizing radiation systems, XPDT has the potential to supplement radiotherapy (RT) and decrease the radiation dose given to patients while improving the cytotoxic efficacy of RT (<a id="body-ref-R9" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R9" data-xml-rid="R9" aria-label="Reference 9"><i>9</i></a>). A critical factor in the performance of XPDT is the efficiency in ROS generation per unit dose (<a id="body-ref-R10" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R10" data-xml-rid="R10" aria-label="Reference 10"><i>10</i></a>). Thus, scintillators with a high light yield and photosensitizers with a high singlet oxygen quantum yield are required to produce ROS for a minimal given radiation dose.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="wp-image-615 size-full aligncenter" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/systemic-antitumor-immune-1.jpg" alt="systemic-antitumor-immune" width="900" height="694" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/systemic-antitumor-immune-1.jpg 900w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/systemic-antitumor-immune-1-300x231.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/systemic-antitumor-immune-1-768x592.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></div>
</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">
<section id="sec-1" data-type="introduction">
<div role="paragraph">In this study, we synthesized a novel XPDT agent, PEGylated Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Eu@SiO<sub>2</sub>-methylene blue (pYSM), and demonstrated that XPDT that was performed with pYSM in combination with immune checkpoint blockade promoted a systemic antitumor immune response against solid tumors (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F1">Fig. 1, A and B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). We chose Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> doped with europium as a prototype phosphor because of its high light yield under x-ray excitation (<a id="body-ref-R11-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R11" data-xml-rid="R11" aria-label="Reference 11"><i>11</i></a>), relative ease of nanoscale fabrication, remarkable chemical inertness, and the accepted clinical use of yttria-based compounds (<a id="body-ref-R12" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R12" data-xml-rid="R12" aria-label="Reference 12"><i>12</i></a>). The photosensitizer was loaded into a mesoporous silica shell to couple the scintillator emission and photosensitizer absorption, this shell was then coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains to increase the circulation time and biodistribution of the agent in the tumor microenvironment (<a id="body-ref-R13" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R13" data-xml-rid="R13" aria-label="Reference 13"><i>13</i></a>). In addition, whereas prior reports of XPDT agents have used long exposure times with low-energy x-rays [50 kilovolt peaks (kVp)], which do not penetrate well into deep tissues, our results use intravenously administered nanoparticles that accumulate in the tumor and are triggered by clinically relevant, deep-penetrating orthovoltage x-rays (320 kVp) (fig. S1) and define a heretofore unexplored synergy with immunotherapy. An abscopal effect was observed in mice with bilateral tumors where right-sided tumors treated with combination XPDT and immunotherapy also resulted in a significant size reduction of untreated left-sided tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first work assessing the systemic immune response of XPDT combined with immunotherapy. The results found in this study suggest that XPDT in combination with checkpoint blockade could change the immune profile of solid tumors and increase their sensitivity to a systemic antitumor immune response.</div>
</section>
<section id="sec-2" data-type="results">
<h3>RESULTS</h3>
<section id="sec-2-1">
<h3>XPDT agent synthesis</h3>
<div role="paragraph">Scintillating Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Eu nanoparticles were synthesized via an aqueous coprecipitation method. YCl<sub>3</sub> and EuCl<sub>3</sub> were mixed in deionized (DI) water with urea as a precipitating agent and 50-kDa polyvinyl pyrrolidone as a capping agent to control the size and polydispersity of the nanoparticles (<a id="body-ref-R14" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R14" data-xml-rid="R14" aria-label="Reference 14"><i>14</i></a>, <a id="body-ref-R15" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R15" data-xml-rid="R15" aria-label="Reference 15"><i>15</i></a>). The resulting rare earth hydroxycarbonates were calcined in open air to yield the scintillating binary oxide. A custom-built optical setup was used to measure the light output of the nanoscintillators excited by 320-kVp x-rays (figs. S2 and S3). To optimize the light yield of the scintillators, the europium doping concentration was optimized. As seen in <a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F2">Fig. 2A<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images show that the resulting binary oxide nanoparticles are well segregated and have a uniform diameter of ~50 nm. High-resolution TEM also showed a characteristic plane along the [101] zone axis because of the typical orientation of planes (200) and (220) with <i>d</i>-spacings of 0.51 and 0.8 nm, respectively (fig. S4). <a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F2">Figure 2B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a> shows the radioluminescence spectra of the Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Eu nanoparticles under x-ray excitation. The peak near 611 nm is due to the <sup>5</sup>D<sub>0</sub> → <sup>7</sup>F<sub>2</sub> transition, which is characteristic of the europium dopant and remains consistent across different doping concentrations (<a id="body-ref-R11-2" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R11" data-xml-rid="R11" aria-label="Reference 11"><i>11</i></a>). <a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F2">Figure 2C<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a> shows the relationship between the doping concentration of europium and the resulting light yield from 2 to 8% europium doping. When the doping concentration is low, adding more dopant ions increases the light yield. Beyond 5% doping, the light yield begins to decrease as dopant ions are added, which can be due to a self-quenching process where the europium luminescence centers absorb each others’ light emission, resulting in an overall decrease in light yield (<a id="body-ref-R16" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R16" data-xml-rid="R16" aria-label="Reference 16"><i>16</i></a>). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) were performed (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F2">Fig. 2, D and E<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>) to further confirm the presence of europium and the crystallinity of the yttria lattice after calcination (fig. S5) (<a id="body-ref-R17" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R17" data-xml-rid="R17" aria-label="Reference 17"><i>17</i></a>). XRD peaks matched cubic phase Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (JCPDS #71-0099).</div>
</section>
</section>
</div>
<div role="paragraph">
<div role="paragraph"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-616 size-full" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/XPDT.jpg" alt="XPDT" width="900" height="694" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/XPDT.jpg 900w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/XPDT-300x231.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/XPDT-768x592.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></div>
</div>
<div role="paragraph">
<h3>In vitro XPDT studies</h3>
<div role="paragraph">To characterize x-ray–excited ROS generation, a singlet oxygen sensor green (SOSG) assay was performed with pYSM compared to methylene blue and DI water as controls (<a id="body-ref-R20" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R20" data-xml-rid="R20" aria-label="Reference 20"><i>20</i></a>). As seen in <a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F4">Fig. 4A<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>, the pYSM group produced the largest statistically significant amount of singlet oxygen upon irradiation compared to controls, showing that Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Eu is required to activate methylene blue upon x-ray excitation. Notably, there was no appreciable increase in temperature ruling out a photothermal mechanism of action (fig. S8). Encouraged by these results, we incubated the pYSM agent at varying concentrations with murine Panc02 pancreatic cancer cells to measure the toxicity of the XPDT agent. As seen in <a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F4">Fig. 4B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>, cells remained viable at concentrations above 100 μg/ml. In addition, cellular uptake studies were performed via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which showed that 6 hours of incubation resulted in the maximal pYSM concentration within cells (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F4">Fig. 4C<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was performed, showing a statistically significant difference in cellular uptake between 0 and 6 hours of incubation. To test the in vitro consequences of XPDT-mediated singlet oxygen production, we treated Panc02 cells with pYSM particles and respective controls and split them into irradiated and nonirradiated groups (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F4">Fig. 4D<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). While no noticeable cell death occurred in the nonirradiated group, cell viability decreased significantly after a dose of 8–gray (Gy) irradiation in cells cultured with pYSM when compared to the control and pYSM-only groups, suggesting that pYSM could be used as an XPDT agent.</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-617 size-full" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SOSG-assay.jpg" alt="SOSG-assay" width="900" height="694" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SOSG-assay.jpg 900w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SOSG-assay-300x231.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SOSG-assay-768x592.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></div>
</div>
<div role="paragraph">
<h3>In vivo XPDT studies</h3>
<div role="paragraph">To be effective as an XPDT agent, systemically delivered pYSM must accumulate in the target tumor. In a biodistribution analysis conducted in mice with subcutaneous Panc02 tumors, normal organs and tumors were harvested at 8, 16, and 24 hours following the intravenous administration of pYSM. Tumor uptake was noted to be relatively constant at all time points with no statistically significant difference in uptake, while the liver, spleen, and lungs showed high uptake as well (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F5">Fig. 5A<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). On the basis of this, we proceeded to perform a tumor regrowth delay experiment with pYSM administered intravenously 24 hours before irradiation with a single dose of 10 Gy. A statistically significant decrease in tumor volume was noted in the pYSM + radiation group compared to radiation alone (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F5">Fig. 5B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Immunohistochemical analysis of the tumors harvested from these mice showed an increase in the CD8<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in the XPDT-treated tumors (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F5">Fig. 5, C and D<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Surprised by this finding, we went back to test the in vitro immunogenicity of XPDT and observed that XPDT increased the expression of both calreticulin and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on the surface of Panc02 cells when compared to just RT or only particle incubation. This indicated that not only was there an immunogenic cell death response (<a id="body-ref-R21" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R21" data-xml-rid="R21" aria-label="Reference 21"><i>21</i></a>), but there was also an immunosuppressive (<a id="body-ref-R22" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#core-R22" data-xml-rid="R22" aria-label="Reference 22"><i>22</i></a>), yet druggable, phenotype activated as well (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F5">Fig. 5, E and F<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). This experiment suggested that the antitumor activity of XPDT therapy could be enhanced if coupled with immunotherapy aimed at boosting the immune response mounted against the tumor. Mouse weights were also separately tracked for the control, RT-only, pYSM-only, and XPDT groups and showed no appreciable difference across the treatment groups, suggesting no overt toxicity of the pYSMs (fig. S9).</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-618 size-full" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/tw11.jpg" alt="tw11" width="900" height="694" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/tw11.jpg 900w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/tw11-300x231.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/tw11-768x592.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
</div>
<div role="paragraph">
<h3>XPDT combined with immunotherapy</h3>
<div role="paragraph">To test this hypothesis, ovalbumin-expressing Panc02 (Panc02-Ova) cells were subcutaneously implanted in both thighs of immune-competent C57BL/6 mice and treated with a combination of XPDT and anti-PD1 immunotherapy. The tumors on the right thigh were treated, but the tumors on the left thigh were not. These nonirradiated tumors served as surrogates for distant or metastatic disease, allowing us to interrogate abscopal responses driven by the activation of a robust systemic immune response. Our analysis of the right-sided tumor showed that pYSM + RT significantly decreased the tumor growth, as previously demonstrated (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F5">Fig. 5B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>), but also that this tumor growth inhibition was significantly augmented by the addition of anti-PD1 therapy (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F6">Fig. 6A<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Compared to the control group, two groups of mice had statistically significant regression in tumor size: mice given either XPDT or XPDT + anti-PD1 therapy. Similarly, the left-sided tumors in the XPDT + anti-PD1 group had a statistically significant decrease in tumor volume, suggesting that a robust systemic immune response was activated (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F6">Fig. 6B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>).</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-620 size-full" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111.jpg" alt="xpdt111" width="898" height="385" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111.jpg 898w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111-300x129.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111-768x329.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 898px) 100vw, 898px" /></div>
</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">To further characterize this effect, we performed immunophenotyping of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes harvested from both tumors using flow cytometry. In the treated right-sided tumors, XPDT therapy significantly increased T cell infiltration in the tumor, as indicated by the significant increase in CD3<sup>+</sup> T cells (inclusive of CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells) in the RT + pYSM–treated tumors when compared to the control group (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F7">Fig. 7, A and B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). While the addition of anti-PD1 therapy to RT + pYSM did not significantly increase the infiltration of tumors by T cells, it increased the proportion of the activated CD8<sup>+</sup>IFN-γ<sup>+</sup> T cells and elicited a trend toward increased antigen-specific CD8<sup>+</sup>tet<sup>+</sup> T cells (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F7">Fig. 7, C and D<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Analysis of the immunosuppressive cell populations showed that radiation by itself and RT + pYSM + aPD1 decreased the number of CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup>FOXP3<sup>+</sup> regulatory T cells (T<sub>regs</sub>) when compared to untreated control tumors (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F7">Fig. 7G<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). While there were modest, nonstatistically significant differences in the proportion of interferon-γ (IFN-γ)–secreting CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells [T helper 1 (T<sub>H</sub>1) cells] between the groups (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F7">Fig. 7E<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>), there was a significant decrease in the CD11b<sup>+</sup>GR1<sup>+</sup> myeloid-derived suppressor T cell (MDSC) population in between the RT-only group versus the control and RT + pYSM groups (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F7">Fig. 7F<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). While anti-PD1 therapy slightly increased the M1/M2 macrophage ratio in treated tumors, no statistically significant response was observed (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F7">Fig. 7H<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>).</div>
<div role="paragraph"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-621 size-full" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt11122.jpg" alt="xpdt11122" width="800" height="477" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt11122.jpg 800w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt11122-300x179.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt11122-768x458.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">Analysis of the left tumors, which were not irradiated, showed that neither the RT group nor the RT + pYSM group showed an increase in the CD3<sup>+</sup> population (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8A<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). However, anti-PD1 in combination with radiation and pYSM significantly increased the infiltration of CD3<sup>+</sup> T cells (inclusive of CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells) in the nonirradiated tumors compared to nonirradiated tumors in the pYSM + RT group (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8, A and B<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Anti-PD1 therapy in combination with RT and pYSM significantly increased the activated CD8<sup>+</sup>IFN-γ<sup>+</sup> T cells when compared to the RT + pYSM–treated counterparts (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8C<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). However, there was no statistically significant increase in antigen-specific T cells in the left tumors of mice between the different treatment groups (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8D<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). None of the treatment groups significantly altered the T<sub>reg</sub> population in the nonirradiated tumors (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8G<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Similar to the irradiated right tumor, RT significantly increased the population of CD11b<sup>+</sup>GR1<sup>+</sup> MDSCs, but unlike the irradiated tumors, an increase in IFN-γ–secreting T<sub>H</sub>1 cells was also noted in the RT group in the tumor microenvironment (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8, E and F<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). When comparing the RT alone and RT + aPD1 groups, the addition of anti-PD1 therapy decreased MDSCs in nonirradiated (left) tumors (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8F<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). However, none of the other treatment groups significantly altered the MDSC population in the tumor microenvironment of the nontreated tumor compared to the control (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8F<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Notably, the M1/M2 macrophage ratio in the left tumor was significantly higher in the RT + pYSM + aPD1 group compared to the RT + aPD1 group (<a class="open-in-viewer" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr4008#F8">Fig. 8G<span class="sr-only">Opens in image viewer</span></a>). Collectively, these results suggest a shift in the tumor immune microenvironment favoring a pro-inflammatory antitumor phenotype when XPDT is coupled with immunotherapy.</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-622 size-full" src="https://pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111223.jpg" alt="xpdt111223" width="800" height="477" srcset="http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111223.jpg 800w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111223-300x179.jpg 300w, http://www.pactandhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/xpdt111223-768x458.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/systemic-antitumor-immune-response-of-doped-yttria-nanoscintillators-under-low-dose-x-ray-irradiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Towards targeted-gold nanoparticle enhanced chemoradiation therapy of pancreatic cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/towards-targeted-gold-nanoparticle-enhanced-chemoradiation-therapy-of-pancreatic-cancer/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/towards-targeted-gold-nanoparticle-enhanced-chemoradiation-therapy-of-pancreatic-cancer/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/issue/82/12_Supplement]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/issue/82/12_Supplement">https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/issue/82/12_Supplement</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/towards-targeted-gold-nanoparticle-enhanced-chemoradiation-therapy-of-pancreatic-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene Expression and Early Radiation Response of Two Distinct Neuroblastoma Cell Lines</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/gene-expression-and-early-radiation-response-of-two-distinct-neuroblastoma-cell-lines/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/gene-expression-and-early-radiation-response-of-two-distinct-neuroblastoma-cell-lines/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Abstract Introduction: Neuroblastoma is one of the most common childhood cancers with one of the lowest survival rates, accounting for 15% of childhood cancer mortality. Approximately half of children treated for high-risk neuroblastoma will relapse following remission, while another 15% of patients do not respond to initial treatment. External beam radiation is infrequently used for &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/gene-expression-and-early-radiation-response-of-two-distinct-neuroblastoma-cell-lines/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Gene Expression and Early Radiation Response of Two Distinct Neuroblastoma Cell Lines</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Abstract</b><br />
<b>Introduction:</b> Neuroblastoma is one of the most common childhood cancers with one of the lowest survival rates, accounting for 15% of childhood cancer mortality. Approximately half of children treated for high-risk neuroblastoma will relapse following remission, while another 15% of patients do not respond to initial treatment. External beam radiation is infrequently used for treatment of pediatric cancer such as neuroblastoma, typically reserved for palliative care in patients with aggressive metastatic disease who fail to respond to alternative treatments. Understanding effects of radiation on neuroblastoma cells could improve efficacy of this final means of therapy to decrease tumor burden and stabilize the disease. Methods: In this study, we found that two microRNAs with opposite functions were expressed in two neuroblastoma cell lines with marked differences in radiosensitivity. Clonogenic assays were used to evaluate the radiation responses for these 2 cell lines, designated SK-N-AS and SK-N-DZ; cells were then irradiated at doses that cause 90% cell killing based on clonogenic assay and their RNA isolated and subjected to microarray analysis. In addition, cells were transfected with pre-miRNA constructs that led to overexpression of microRNAs miR-34a and miR-1228 to determine possible microRNA regulation of radiation response. Results: Statistically significant differences were detected for expression of several thousand genes when the 2 cell lines were compared with each other. In comparison, radiation exposure resulted in only minor gene expression differences of less than 2-fold at the 1 h postirradiation timepoint in both cell lines. Overexpression of miR-34a and miR-1228 in either cell line did not alter this outcome. </p>
<p><b>Discussion:</b> While these two neuroblastoma cell lines are phenotypically diverse and gene expression differences between them are extensive, we observed that the regulation of gene expression in both cell lines is in a stable equilibrium at early timepoints after exposure to ionizing radiation.</p>
<p><a href="https://karger.com/ocl/article/101/7/446/853832/Gene-Expression-and-Early-Radiation-Response-of">https://karger.com/ocl/article/101/7/446/853832/Gene-Expression-and-Early-Radiation-Response-of</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/gene-expression-and-early-radiation-response-of-two-distinct-neuroblastoma-cell-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2-deoxy-D-glucose mitigates Citrobacter rodentium and dibenzazepine-induced gastrointestinal damage and colitis: novel implications of 2-DG polypharmacopea</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/2-deoxy-d-glucose-mitigates-citrobacter-rodentium-and-dibenzazepine-induced-gastrointestinal-damage-and-colitis-novel-implications-of-2-dg-polypharmacopea/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/2-deoxy-d-glucose-mitigates-citrobacter-rodentium-and-dibenzazepine-induced-gastrointestinal-damage-and-colitis-novel-implications-of-2-dg-polypharmacopea/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Abstract Purpose Citrobacter rodentium (CR) infection coupled with blocking Notch/Wnt signaling via γ-secretase inhibitor dibenzazepine (DBZ) disrupts the gastro-intestinal (GI) barrier and induces colitis, akin to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced GI-injury. We investigated the effects of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) to ameliorate the CR-DBZ-induced GI damage. Materials and methods NIH:Swiss outbred mice were inoculated with 109CFUs of CR &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/2-deoxy-d-glucose-mitigates-citrobacter-rodentium-and-dibenzazepine-induced-gastrointestinal-damage-and-colitis-novel-implications-of-2-dg-polypharmacopea/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">2-deoxy-D-glucose mitigates Citrobacter rodentium and dibenzazepine-induced gastrointestinal damage and colitis: novel implications of 2-DG polypharmacopea</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br />
<strong>Purpose</strong><br />
Citrobacter rodentium (CR) infection coupled with blocking Notch/Wnt signaling via γ-secretase inhibitor dibenzazepine (DBZ) disrupts the gastro-intestinal (GI) barrier and induces colitis, akin to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced GI-injury. We investigated the effects of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) to ameliorate the CR-DBZ-induced GI damage.</p>
<p><strong>Materials and methods</strong><br />
NIH:Swiss outbred mice were inoculated with 109CFUs of CR orally. DBZ was administered intraperitoneally (10 μM/kg b.wt; for 10 days 2 days post-CR infection). Mice were fed with 0.4% 2-DG (w/v) daily in drinking water. For microbiota depletion, antibiotics (Abx), 1 g/l metronidazole, and 0.2 g/l ciprofloxacin were administered for 10 days in drinking water. Oxidative stress, survival assay, colonic crypt hyperplasia, Notch/Wnt downstream signaling, immunomodulation, and bacterial dysbiosis were measured.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong><br />
We show that real-time visualization of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is similar during CR-induced colonic infection and IR-induced GI-damage. The histology revealed that dietary 2-DG mitigates CR + DBZ-induced colitis and improves survival compared with CR + DBZ alone. These changes were phenocopied in Abx-treated mice. Both 2-DG and Abx reduced dysbiosis, increased proliferation, inhibited pro-inflammatory response, and restored Hes-1 and β-catenin protein levels, in the crypts.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
The energy disruptor 2-DG mitigates bacterial infection and its responsive hyperplasia/colitis, indicating its utility as a mitigator of infection/IR-induced GI-damage.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09553002.2022.2110297">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09553002.2022.2110297</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/2-deoxy-d-glucose-mitigates-citrobacter-rodentium-and-dibenzazepine-induced-gastrointestinal-damage-and-colitis-novel-implications-of-2-dg-polypharmacopea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Differential expression of deubiquitinating enzymes and its related DNA damage response genes in neuroblastoma heterogeneity</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/differential-expression-of-deubiquitinating-enzymes-and-its-related-dna-damage-response-genes-in-neuroblastoma-heterogeneity/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/differential-expression-of-deubiquitinating-enzymes-and-its-related-dna-damage-response-genes-in-neuroblastoma-heterogeneity/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Abstract LB015: Differential expression of deubiquitinating enzymes and its related DNA damage response genes in neuroblastoma heterogeneity Abstract SK-N-AS and SK-N-DZ are two cell lines of pediatric solid tumors neuroblastomas well characterized to evaluate heterogeneity between different neuroblastomas and are presumed as models for differences between different neuroblastoma. Using this model system, we recently evaluated &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/differential-expression-of-deubiquitinating-enzymes-and-its-related-dna-damage-response-genes-in-neuroblastoma-heterogeneity/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Differential expression of deubiquitinating enzymes and its related DNA damage response genes in neuroblastoma heterogeneity</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abstract LB015: Differential expression of deubiquitinating enzymes and its related DNA damage response genes in neuroblastoma heterogeneity</strong></p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br />
SK-N-AS and SK-N-DZ are two cell lines of pediatric solid tumors neuroblastomas well characterized to evaluate heterogeneity between different neuroblastomas and are presumed as models for differences between different neuroblastoma. Using this model system, we recently evaluated if radiation could improve efficacy of radiation therapy and to follow these studies later with animal models to determine decrease of tumor burden. Differences between the N-type and S-type neuroblastoma cell lines SK-N-DZ and SK-N-AS, respectively were observed to be high and their responses to radiation stress were equally heterogeneous. Ubiquitin signaling plays a key role during the DNA damage response in protein recruitment and protein interactions. Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) deconjugate ubiquitin from ubiquitylated substrate proteins to control their activity and stability and are shown to regulate various biological processes. DUBs may play a role in regulating the radiosensitivity of cancer cells by modulating DNA damage response and repair pathways. Determination of specific DUBs that are involved in regulating radiosensitivity in cancer cells will provide opportunity for drug targeting and visa-vis enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy in neuroblastoma cancer treatment. Here, using bioinformatic tools, the differentially regulated DUBs were identified. The relationship between DEGs-DUBs with the genes involved in various DNA repair pathways (NHEJ, HR and Fanconi anemia pathway; KEGG pathway database) are described. We identified 32 DEGs (14 upregulated and 18 downregulated) with these neuroblastoma cell lines. USP22 and USP41 DUBs and its differential expression in these cell lines denotes the importance of such analysis. Especially considering USP22 a potentially biomarker for predicting the outcome of patients with neuroblastoma. These DEG-DUBs were likewise correlated with 91 DNA damage response (DDR) genes belonging to three different pathways (NHEJ, HR and Fanconi anemia pathway). Out of which 44 of the DDR genes showed significant correlation with DEG-DUBs. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms underlying the complex relationship of these DUBs and to determine the critical DUBs for drug targeting and to enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy in cancer treatment.</p>
<p><strong>Citation Format:</strong> Vaibhav Vaibhav, Fahika Nazeerulla, Tatjana Paunesku, Ekta Tripathi, Gayle Woloschak, Prashanthi Karyala, Rao V. Papineni. Differential expression of deubiquitinating enzymes and its related DNA damage response genes in neuroblastoma heterogeneity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB015.</p>
<p><a href="https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/84/7_Supplement/LB015/742313/Abstract-LB015-Differential-expression-of">https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/84/7_Supplement/LB015/742313/Abstract-LB015-Differential-expression-of</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/differential-expression-of-deubiquitinating-enzymes-and-its-related-dna-damage-response-genes-in-neuroblastoma-heterogeneity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technological advancements in cancer diagnostics: Improvements and limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-cancer-diagnostics-improvements-and-limitations/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-cancer-diagnostics-improvements-and-limitations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2023 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cnr2.1764]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cnr2.1764">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cnr2.1764</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-cancer-diagnostics-improvements-and-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technological Advancements in External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT): An Indispensable Tool for Cancer Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-external-beam-radiation-therapy-ebrt-an-indispensable-tool-for-cancer-treatment/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-external-beam-radiation-therapy-ebrt-an-indispensable-tool-for-cancer-treatment/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2023 14:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012312/]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012312/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012312/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-external-beam-radiation-therapy-ebrt-an-indispensable-tool-for-cancer-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technological advancements in brachytherapy of cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-brachytherapy-of-cancer/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-brachytherapy-of-cancer/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2023 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pactandhealth.com/?p=488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cnr2.1764]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cnr2.1764</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/technological-advancements-in-brachytherapy-of-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development of radiation-triggered phosphor platform for localized activation in combinatory cancer treatment (July, 2021)</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/proceedings-aacr-annual-meeting-2021-april-10-15-2021-and-may-17-21-2021-philadelphia-pa-abstract-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-a-single-stranded-rna-virus-with-lar/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/proceedings-aacr-annual-meeting-2021-april-10-15-2021-and-may-17-21-2021-philadelphia-pa-abstract-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-a-single-stranded-rna-virus-with-lar/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pactandhealth.com/?p=258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2021; April 10-15, 2021 and May 17-21, 2021; Philadelphia, PA Abstract A defined spatial and temporal control of induction of toxicity in response to external ionizing radiation such as X-rays has unique clinical benefits over conventional systems such as passive drug delivery or its activation. Here, we have combined X-rays with &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/proceedings-aacr-annual-meeting-2021-april-10-15-2021-and-may-17-21-2021-philadelphia-pa-abstract-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-a-single-stranded-rna-virus-with-lar/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Development of radiation-triggered phosphor platform for localized activation in combinatory cancer treatment (July, 2021)</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="issue-title">Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2021; April 10-15, 2021 and May 17-21, 2021; Philadelphia, PA</div>
<div class="executive-summary"></div>
<div id="abstract-1" class="section abstract">
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p id="p-1">A defined spatial and temporal control of induction of toxicity in response to external ionizing radiation such as X-rays has unique clinical benefits over conventional systems such as passive drug delivery or its activation. Here, we have combined X-rays with well characterized nanoscintilators emitting light that activates paired photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy (PDT) that improves the prowess of PDT to deep seated tumor treatment. Yttrium oxide nanoparticle construct doped with Europium (YOE) and coated with a silica layer entrapping methylene blue (MB) as the photosensitizer was fabricated. The nanoconstruct (YSM, for YOE, silica, MB) was decorated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) to make it biocompatible and characterized extensively for physicochemically parameters. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed a resultant average nanoparticle diameter of 24.1 ± 5.7 nm, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) a hydrodynamic diameter of 135.3 ± 17.9 nm. This nanoconstruct was evaluated for its ability to generate singlet oxygen reactive oxygen species upon irradiation using singlet oxygen sensor green (SOSG) fluorescence assay. Further, demonstrated that this nanoconstruct was taken up by cancer cells in vitro and by tumors in vivo. The uptake of YSM particles by Panc02 murine pancreatic cancer cells was tested by inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry. This demonstrated robust uptake in cells after 24hr incubation. No noticeable cell death occurred with doses of 0 Gy and 4 Gy, cell viability decreased significantly after a dose of 8 Gy irradiation in cells cultured with YSM when compared to controls. Since 8 Gy is within the range of a clinically applicable dose used routinely in stereotactic radiotherapy regimens, these results verified the potential of YSM to be used as scintillator-photosensitizer complexes for x-ray activated photodynamic therapy. Finally the biodistribution of YSM nanoconstructs in vivo in C57BL6 mice harboring subcutaneous Panc02 tumors show YSM accumulation in tumors. A versatile, biocompatible Yttrium oxide scintillator-photosensitizer complex (YSM) that can generate x-ray induced cytotoxic reactive oxygen species is fabricated. This is capable of facilitating x-ray activated photodynamic therapy (XPDT (external beam) and/or iXPDT (internal x-ray source)). It shows promise in maximizing the efficacy of the combinatory treatment and enhanced improvement of the quality of life and overall survival of cancer patients.</p>
<p id="p-2"><strong>Citation Format:</strong> Rao V. Papineni, Sunil Krishnan, Ajayan Pulickel, Onur Sahin. Development of radiation-triggered phosphor platform for localized activation in combinatory cancer treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 3057.</p>
</div>
<ul class="copyright-statement">
<li id="copyright-statement-1" class="fn">©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/proceedings-aacr-annual-meeting-2021-april-10-15-2021-and-may-17-21-2021-philadelphia-pa-abstract-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-a-single-stranded-rna-virus-with-lar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inhibition of pseudo SARS-CoV-2 binding activity of a anti-cancer polypharmacological agent analogs (July, 2021)</title>
		<link>http://www.pactandhealth.com/abstract-713-inhibition-of-pseudo-sars-cov-2-binding-activity-of-a-anti-cancer-polypharmacological-agent-analogs-july-2021/</link>
					<comments>http://www.pactandhealth.com/abstract-713-inhibition-of-pseudo-sars-cov-2-binding-activity-of-a-anti-cancer-polypharmacological-agent-analogs-july-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pactandhealth.com/?p=256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2021; April 10-15, 2021 and May 17-21, 2021; Philadelphia, PA Abstract Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), a single-stranded RNA virus with largest genomes (∼ 29,800 bases) of all viruses, causes the infectious disease, COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic betacoronavirus transmitted through airborne and fecal-oral routes infecting nasal, lung, and intestinal &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="http://www.pactandhealth.com/abstract-713-inhibition-of-pseudo-sars-cov-2-binding-activity-of-a-anti-cancer-polypharmacological-agent-analogs-july-2021/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Inhibition of pseudo SARS-CoV-2 binding activity of a anti-cancer polypharmacological agent analogs (July, 2021)</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="issue-title">Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2021; April 10-15, 2021 and May 17-21, 2021; Philadelphia, PA</div>
<div class="executive-summary"></div>
<div id="abstract-1" class="section abstract">
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p id="p-1">Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), a single-stranded RNA virus with largest genomes (∼ 29,800 bases) of all viruses, causes the infectious disease, COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic betacoronavirus transmitted through airborne and fecal-oral routes infecting nasal, lung, and intestinal tissues causing over 26 million confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and nearly 900,000 associated deaths worldwide as of September 2020. The surface of SARS-CoV-2 is covered with copies of spike glycoprotein (SGP) that plays a pivotal role in virus entry in host cells utilizing angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as an attachment and entry receptor. We have successfully made a high titer replication-incompetent third-generation lentiviral vector pseudotyped with SARS-2-CoV SGP (pLV-S). Upon successful attachment and entry, the lentiviral vector causes enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) to be expressed in the infected cell. Here, we show how the polypharmacological agent, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), a glucose mimic, and well characterized anti-cancer drug, and its analogs inhibit spike protein binding to the ACE2 receptors. This is as suggested from the 2DG and two analogs inhibition, with a low micromolar affinity, the pLV-S attachment and entry resulting in reduced cell fluorescence of infected HEK293 cells. In addition, we describe 2DG and analogs has the potential to deliver polypharmacological effects on the COVID-through inhibition of glycolysis (at energy status), modulation of inflammatory responses (cytokine storm) and alterations in glycosylation of viral proteins. A unique class of adjuvants and mitigants in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity is presented here.</p>
<p id="p-2"><strong>Citation Format:</strong> Rao V. Papineni, Amitava Adhikary, Ritesh Tandon, Dipanwita Mitra. Inhibition of pseudo SARS-CoV-2 binding activity of a anti-cancer polypharmacological agent analogs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 713.</p>
</div>
<ul class="copyright-statement">
<li id="copyright-statement-1" class="fn">©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pactandhealth.com/abstract-713-inhibition-of-pseudo-sars-cov-2-binding-activity-of-a-anti-cancer-polypharmacological-agent-analogs-july-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
